Social Surveys – benefits and Drawbacks. The Theoretical Benefits Of Personal Surveys

Social Surveys – benefits and Drawbacks. The Theoretical Benefits Of Personal Surveys

Personal studies are really a quantitative, positivist research technique composed of structured questionnaires and interviews. This post considers the theoretical, practical and advantages that are ethical drawbacks of utilizing social studies in social research.

Detachment, Objectivity and Validity

Positivists favour questionnaires because they’re a detached and objective (unbiased) technique, in which the sociologist’s involvement that is personal participants is held to the very least.

Hypothesis Testing

Questionnaires are especially ideal for testing hypotheses about cause and impact relationships between various factors, since the fact that they’re quantifiable permits us to find correlations.

As an example, according to federal government data on academic success we all know that white guys on complimentary class dishes achieve at a dramatically reduced degree than Chinese girls on complimentary class dishes. We fairly hypothesise that the reason being variations in parental attitudes – Chinese moms and dads may appreciate training more extremely, plus they could be stricter with kids in terms of homework when compared with parents that are white. Good questionnaire design and appropriate sampling would allow us to evaluate this hypothesis out. Good sampling would further let us see if those white class that is working that do well have moms and dads with comparable attitudes to those Chinese girls that do well.


Questionnaires let the researcher to get information from a number that is large of, and so the outcomes should really be more agent of this wider populace than with additional qualitative practices. Nonetheless, all of this varies according to appropriate sampling methods getting used therefore the scientists knowledge that is having of really completes the questionnaire.


Questionnaires are viewed as one of the most dependable methods of data collection – then they should give similar results if repeated by another researcher. There are two main major causes for this:

If the scientific studies are duplicated, you can easily make use of the precise same questionnaire meaning the participants are expected the same questions in identical purchase as well as have actually the exact same selection of responses.

With self-completion questions, specially those delivered by post, there’s absolutely no researcher present to influence the outcomes.

The dependability of questionnaires implies that whenever we do find variations in responses, then we could be fairly sure that the reason being the views regarding the participants have actually changed as time passes. As a result, questionnaires certainly are a method that is good conducting longitudinal research where modification in the long run is calculated.

Practical Advantages

Questionnaires really are a fast and low priced way of collecting huge amounts of information from many individuals, even in the event they have been commonly dispersed geographically in the event that questionnaire is delivered by post or carried out online. It is hard to observe how every other research technique could offer 10s of millions of responses as it is the actual situation using the British national census.

Into the context of training, Connor and Dewson (2001) posted almost 4000 questionnaires to pupils at 14 advanced schooling organizations inside their research for the facets which influenced class that is working to go to college.

With self-completion questionnaires there’s no necessity to recruit and train interviewers, which decreases expense.

The info is quick to analyse as soon as it is often gathered. With on line questionnaires, pre-coded concerns could be updated real time.

Ethical Problems

Whenever a respondent is offered a questionnaire, it really is fairly apparent that scientific studies are happened, so informed consent isn’t ordinarily issue provided that researchers are truthful concerning the reason for the investigation.

Additionally it is a fairly unobtrusive technique, provided the detachment associated with researcher, and it’s also quite a straightforward matter for participants to just ignore questionnaires when they don’t would you like to finish them.

Theoretical Drawbacks of Questionnaires

Problems validity that is affecting Interpretivists make an amount of criticisms of questionnaires

Firstly there was the imposition problem – once the researcher chooses the relevant concerns, they’ve been determining what is very important as opposed to the respondent, along with closed ended concerns the respondent needs to fit their responses into what’s being offered. The end result is the fact that respondent may possibly not be in a position to go to town into the method in which wish to. The dwelling of this questionnaire therefore distorts the respondents’ definitions and undermines the credibility for the information

Next, Interpretivists argue that the detached nature of questionnaires additionally the not enough close contact between researcher and respondent ensures that it is impossible to ensure that the participants are interpreting the concerns within the way that is same the researcher. This is also true where highly complex subjects are participating – If we tick ‘yes’ that i’m Christian’ – this may suggest a selection of things – from my being baptised yet not practising or really thinking to being truly a devout Fundamentalist. Because of this explanation Interpretivists typically choose qualitative techniques where researchers can be found to explain definitions and probe deeper.

Thirdly, scientists might not be current to check on whether participants are providing socially desirable responses, or simply just lying, or to check always that is really finishing the questionnaire. At the least with interviews scientists can be found to test through to these nagging problems(by watching body gestures or probing further as an example)

Dilemmas impacting representativeness

Postal questionnaires in particular can suffer with the lowest reaction price. As an example, Shere Hite’s (1991) research of ‘love, passion, and violence that is emotional within the America delivered 100, 000 questionnaires but just 4.5% of those had been came back.

All self-completion questionnaires additionally suffer with the situation of a sample that is self-selecting helps make the investigation unrepresentative – particular forms of folks are prone to finish questionnaires – literate individuals as an example, people who have enough time, or individuals who have a confident feeling of self-esteem whenever completing questionnaires.

Practical Difficulties With Questionnaires

The truth that questionnaires must be brief means it is possible to just ever get fairly trivial information from their store, therefore for most subjects, they’re going to must be coupled with more qualitative solutions to attain more understanding.

Although questionnaires are really a form that is relatively cheap of data, it may be essential to provide incentives for individuals to go back them.

Structured Interviews are somewhat more expensive than self-completion questionnaires.

Ethical Problems With questionnaires

They’ve been most readily useful prevented whenever researching delicate subjects.

Related Articles

An Introduction to Social Surveys – Definition and Basic Types of Survey